It seems that I shouldn't even savor the escapism of my adult years, either. We can all agree that video game movies are terrible. Thankfully, most of the adaptations have been limited to games I have had little attachment to. But with Hollywood's ravenous appetite, sooner or later one of my beloved franchises would be desecrated.
I just found out today that a "Bioshock" movie is in the works.
In the words of Darth Vader: "Nnnooooooooo!" Or the translated version: "Do not want!"
It's hard for me to point to any one game as my favorite of all time. But if I had a gun to my head, I'd probably go with "Bioshock." It wasn't perfect by any means, but I love it all the same. It had a solid story and single player experience; there was no pretense of co-op or online play. Too often, those features are shoehorned in, bringing the overall quality down.
Oh, hey, "Bioshock 2!" I didn't see you standing there. You overheard what I said? Good, because it's true, you piece of shit!
I'm sorry, that was uncalled for. I'm sure "Bioshock 2" was a perfectly average shooter. I just prefer to think that it never existed and has nothing to do with the first installment. Kind of like Alien 3 or Indiana Jones 4.
iO9 just posted about the movie today. I like the site (I'm even a member), and they tend to skew towards pessimism. But they're strangely apologetic for "Bioshock." They hope it will be good because it will likely be rated R and 28 Weeks Later director Carlos Fresnadillo is on board.
- So what if it's rated R? That just means you can get away with more cursing, blood, and titties. I don't recall any titties in "Bioshock."
- Who the hell is he? Was 28 Weeks Later anywhere near as good as 28 Days Later? No.
You forgot "Money."
0 comments
Post a Comment